1. I, the Plaintiff-Appellant answered the points and questions raised in the Defendant-Appellee's briefs in the reply briefs, however I would like to add some more clarifying points, to the honorable court in this informal memorandum. The Defendant-Appellee presented points in their briefs that questioned why I, the Plaintiff-Appellant had not stated that my rights had been violated in person more individually and not so generally; and I had answered in the reply briefs that my individual constitutional & civil rights had been violated in many cases which the Defendant-Appellee overlooked or did not comment on entirely, such as the violation of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the CIA where records on mind control were hidden, and the Plaintiff-Appellant had enclosed the CIA FOIA case number filed, and exhibits in the complaint on file in item 1 which showed that the CIA had hid mind control records, which violates the Plaintiff-Appellant's civil and constitutional rights as well as statutory laws.

But even more so I, the Plaintiff-Appellant argued in the main complaint and reply briefs that the Defendant-Appellee's governmental policies and procedures which I did prove in exhibits provided in the main complaint, allow the Defendant-Appellee- the Federal Government and its agencies to violate constitutional rights and statutory laws in general for the general public and in specific for individuals such as myself, that damage's the general public's (the plaintiff-appellants nation, state, and business associates, family, and other associates including the plaintiff-appellant) and the individual's ( the plaintiff- appellant) constitutional and civil rights which protect the legal right to an expectation of a constitutional just, healthy, stable and safe natural, economic, and business environment; since the defendant's federal governmental policies and procedures, allow the defendant and government to violate general and individual civil and constitutional rights and federal and state statutes, and to then hide governmental activities, actions, and information that violate the general public and the individual's constitutional and civil rights and legal statutes and even prevent them from being seen in court by means of classified and hidden governmental policies, procedures, records, and identification schemes.

Presently, there are Federal governmental policies such as President Clinton's New Federal Policy to Ban Non-Consensual U.S. Classified Human Research/Experimentation in the interest of US National Defense which were ordered to be changed by March 27, 1997 in the Federal Register 5/13/97 which a few agencies such as the US Department of Justice, and the US Department of Housing and Urban Development have not signed into notice as they should have); and there are state laws in Michigan, where the Plaintiff-Appellant, resides, (The Michigan Penal Code Act 328 of 1931, Section 750.200i and Section 750.200h ) which ban the use of technologies and governmental actions and policies by state and Federal Government agencies including the use of electromagnetic, nuclear, biological, and radioactive devices on any person for an unlawful purposes defined as an intent to frighten, terrorize, intimidate, threaten, harass injure or kill any person which includes human subject research experimentation for national security reasons. Since the Defendant's and Federal governmental actions and policies are classified and kept hidden under secret, classified, and hidden files, identities, and nonconsensual subject human research programs, for National Security reasons, as stated in this complaint filed, then those records and information can not be accessed to be used in court to defend the Plaintiff-Appellant's civil and constitutional rights and federal and state laws, and that this in and of itself is also a violation of the Plaintiff-Appellant's civil and constitutional rights. I, the Plaintiff-Appellant does allege that I am a US governmental mind control and human subject research victim, as are many citizens in the US and in Michigan, but since we do not have access to classified governmental records that are hidden by various means, we can not easily show this in court, and so we must show that our civil and constitutional rights have been violated by the defendant's governmental policies and procedures; and that the defendant as the government should be required to change their policies and procedures including classified ones, as a partial means of the Plaintiff-Appellant's relief in addition to the million dollar relief, through this court's order to the defendant to not violate the Plaintiff Appellant's & his general public, family, and business associate's constitutional rights, and federal and state laws for any reason including national security reasons as I have asked for in court relief and shown in the main complaint, briefs, and in this memo.